A well respected Canadian doctor is accused by one of his patients of rape in October 1992. The only problem is, the patient doesn’t remember anything the night of the assault.

The doctor voluntarily takes 3 separate DNA blood samples, each time proving his innocence. His DNA did not match the rape kit.

Years would go by without an update, until one day, a shocking admission would force the police to reopen the case. Was it possible that the forensic evidence was wrong?